If you’re a fan of Heat and considering the move to Artist, you’re going to have to pay £169 for it. To buy an X-Form perpetual licence, it’s a whopping £399. However, for just £39 a year you can access the full Avid Complete Plugin Bundle which not only gives you these extra plugins, but also X-Form for use as both an AudioSuite plugin and as an Elastic Audio algorithm. Whilst you still have a fantastic number of Avid plugins included with your subscription (as well as the Pro Tools Inner Circle offers), you lose the following: It looks like an absolute steal at just £79 annually when paid upfront, but apart from the much lower track counts and the advanced automation what exactly is missing in this entry version before the jump to one literally three times the price? Aside from a few omissions such as VCA faders, expanded inputs, advanced metering, mostly it’s the included plugins. ![]() Even 15 years ago when I purchased the Production Toolkit to expand my Pro Tools LE 7 track count from 32 to 48, I don’t think I ever passed 24 in a session. ![]() 32 audio tracks seems generous enough, especially when paired with an equal number of instrument tracks, aux channels and routing folders, and unlimited busses. It seemingly provides, frankly, everything a user like me would need. Well now, a new entry-level version is here featuring Elastic Audio, delay compensation, Beat Detective, my beloved track presets and, most importantly, the ability to host 3rd party AAX plugins. How could Avid possibly entice new users to the “industry standard” when it was such a sandboxed, limited version? When Pro Tools First was released, I may have scrunched my nose up at the relative limitations and lack of functionality it offered. Having used Pro Tools for two decades now, from the first LE incarnations through to this latest Ultimate release, I have to say I’m keenly eyeing Pro Tools Artist. Pro Tools Artist - Very Different From Pro Tools First I’m incredibly lucky to have built up a collection of fantastic reading players and singers who I can trust to deliver the goods without me watching or directing them through a control room window. Sessions are not shared or run remotely I simply provide each session musician with the score part and a basic mix for them to record against. Live instruments and vocals tend to be recorded remotely at the relevant performer’s own setup and emailed over. The iterations and licences of the newly released Pro Tools 2022.4 are causing many a healthy argument online (as to be expected) over who needs what, and who gets what as an existing customer whether perpetual owner or subscriber. Over to Mark… Why Pro Tools Artist Might Be All I Need However in a recent exchange with regular contributor Mark M Thompson, very much a serious pro musician - check out his test drive of AmpliTube 5 MAX to hear his playing, he shared his thoughts that for his needs Artist might well be all he needs. It would be understandable to think that ‘serious’ musicians should be using Studio. The focus of the entry level Artist product is targeting what Avid describe as ‘Next-Gen’ producers and artists. For pretty much every music user who doesn’t use HDX they no longer need Ultimate/Flex. ![]() It was designed to be a ‘walled garden’ product which had significant limitations compared to ‘proper’ Pro Tools and for many people it was just too limited to be useful.Ī lot of attention has been given to the new features Pro Tools Studio has received. ![]() Before it was discontinued Pro Tools First was a free version, designed to be that first step into Pro Tools. Avid have done a lot of work with the release of 2022.4 to address the perceived lack of appeal the Pro Tools family of titles had for new and emerging artists.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |